Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine-Induced Flare-Up of Severe Bronchial Asthma Previously Controlled With Dupilumab: A Case Report.

The widespread after-effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are still a grave threat worldwide. Among them are adverse reactions to vaccines, including those most observed following Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine administration, namely, local reactions at the injection site, fatigue, headache, myalgia, chills, arthralgia, and fever. Patients with asthma particularly present with unique adverse reactions to the BNT162b2 vaccine, notably, an exacerbation in their asthma symptoms as highlighted through the current case report. In this case, a 50-year-old woman had been undergoing treatment for bronchial asthma in the form of inhalation steroids and dupilumab, as well as systemic steroid prednisolone as maintenance therapy. She had mild injection site reactions after her first three COVID-19 vaccinations. She also experienced acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization after the fourth and fifth doses. Her symptoms resolved following steroid therapy. The close association between the timing of vaccinations and the onset of clinical symptoms suggests that the exacerbation episodes were triggered by the vaccine. Therefore, although the BNT162b2 vaccine is safe to administer in patients with bronchial asthma, cases reporting patients sensitized to the BNT162b2 vaccine developing bronchial asthma or experiencing asthma exacerbations should not be neglected. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of flare-ups induced by repeated COVID-19 vaccinations in such patients.

Rituximab resistance at 3months of induction therapy in newly diagnosed or relapsing ANCA-associated vasculitis: A French multicentre retrospective study in 116 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate rituximab (RTX) resistance at 3months (M3) of induction therapy in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) associated vasculitis (AAV). METHODS: Multicentre French retrospective study conducted between 2010 and 2020 including patients with newly diagnosed or relapsing AAV (granulomatosis with polyangiitis or microscopic polyangiitis) having received induction therapy with RTX. Primary endpoint was the presence of RTX resistance at 3months (M3) defined as uncontrolled disease (worsening feature on the BVAS/WG 1month after RTX induction) or disease flare (increase in BVAS/WG of≥1 point before M3). RESULTS: Out of 121 patients included, we analysed 116 patients. Fourteen patients (12%) had RTX resistance at M3 with no difference in baseline demographics, vasculitis type, ANCA type, disease status or organ involvement. Patients with RTX resistance at M3 had a greater proportion of localized disease (43% vs. 18%, P<0.05) and were less often treated by initial methylprednisolone (MP) pulse (21% vs. 58%, P<0.01). Out of the 14 patients with RTX resistance, seven received additional immunosuppressive therapy. All patients were in remission at 6months. Compared to responders, patients with RTX resistance at M3 were less often treated with prophylactic trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (57% vs. 85%, P<0.05). Twenty-four patients died during follow-up, one-third of them from infections and half of them from SARS-CoV-2. CONCLUSION: Twelve percent of patients had RTX resistance at M3. These patients more often had localized form of the disease and were less treated by initial MP pulse and by prophylactic trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

Efficacy and safety of mRNA and AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) are at a potentially higher risk for COVID-19 infection complications. Given their inherent altered immune system and the use of immunomodulatory medications, vaccine immunogenicity could be unpredictable with a suboptimal or even an exaggerated immunological response. The aim of this study is to provide real-time data on the emerging evidence of COVID-19 vaccines' efficacy and safety in patients with ARDs. METHODS: We performed a literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and OVID databases up to 11-13 April 2022 on the efficacy and safety of both types of the mRNA-vaccines and the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines in patients with ARD. The risk of bias in the retrieved studies was evaluated using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. Also, current clinical practice guidelines from multiple international professional societies were reviewed. RESULTS: We identified 60 prognostic studies, 69 case reports and case series, and eight international clinical practice guidelines. Our results demonstrated that most patients with ARDs were able to mount humoral and/or cellular responses after two doses of COVID-19 vaccine although this response was suboptimal in patients receiving certain disease-modifying medications including rituximab, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, daily glucocorticoids >10 mg, abatacept, as well as in older individuals, and those with comorbid interstitial lung diseases. Safety reports on COVID-19 vaccines in patients with ARDs were largely reassuring with mostly self-limiting adverse events and very minimal post-vaccination disease flares. CONCLUSION: Both types of the mRNA-vaccines and the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines are highly effective and safe in patients with ARD. However, due to their suboptimal response in some patients, alternative mitigation strategies such as booster vaccines and shielding practices should also be followed. Management of immunomodulatory treatment regimens during the peri vaccination period should be individualized through shared decision making with patients and their attending rheumatologists.

Primary SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: long-term humoral immune responses and effects on disease activity.

BACKGROUND: Patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) on immunosuppressants (ISPs) may have impaired long-term humoral immune responses and increased disease activity after SARS-CoV-2 infection. We aimed to investigate long-term humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 and increased disease activity after a primary SARS-CoV-2 infection in unvaccinated IMID patients on ISPs. METHODS: IMID patients on active treatment with ISPs and controls (i.e. IMID patients not on ISP and healthy controls) with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection before first vaccination were included from an ongoing prospective cohort study (T2B! study). Clinical data on infections and increased disease activity were registered using electronic surveys and health records. A serum sample was collected before first vaccination to measure SARS-CoV-2 anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) antibodies. RESULTS: In total, 193 IMID patients on ISP and 113 controls were included. Serum samples from 185 participants were available, with a median time of 173 days between infection and sample collection. The rate of seropositive IMID patients on ISPs was 78% compared to 100% in controls (p < 0.001). Seropositivity rates were lowest in patients on anti-CD20 (40.0%) and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents (60.5%), as compared to other ISPs (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Increased disease activity after infection was reported by 68 of 260 patients (26.2%; 95% CI 21.2-31.8%), leading to ISP intensification in 6 out of these 68 patients (8.8%). CONCLUSION: IMID patients using ISPs showed reduced long-term humoral immune responses after primary SARS-CoV-2 infection, which was mainly attributed to treatment with anti-CD20 and anti-TNF agents. Increased disease activity after SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported commonly, but was mostly mild. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NL74974.018.20, Trial ID: NL8900. Registered on 9 September 2020.

Comparing inpatient management of chronic pelvic pain flares before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Abstract: Patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) may experience pain exacerbations requiring hospital admissions. Due to the effects of backlogged elective surgeries and outpatient gynaecology appointments resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, we hypothesised that there would be an increased number of women admitted with CPP flares. We conducted a retrospective review of all acute gynaecology admissions at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh from July to December 2018 (pre-COVID) and 2021 (post-COVID lockdown). We collected information on the proportion of emergency admissions due to CPP, inpatient investigations and subsequent management. Average total indicative hospital inpatient costs for women with CPP were calculated using NHS National Cost Collection data guidance. There was no significant difference in the number of emergency admissions due to pelvic pain before (153/507) and after (160/461) the COVID-19 pandemic. As high as 33 and 31% had a background history of CPP, respectively. Across both timepoints, investigations in women with CPP had low diagnostic yield: <25% had abnormal imaging findings and 0% had positive vaginal swab cultures. Women with CPP received significantly more inpatient morphine, pain team reviews and were more likely to be discharged with strong opioids. Total yearly inpatient costs were £170,104 and £179,156 in 2018 and 2021, respectively. Overall, emergency admission rates for managing CPP flares was similar before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Inpatient resource use for women with CPP remains high, investigations have low diagnostic yield and frequent instigation of opiates on discharge may risk dependence. Improved community care of CPP is needed to reduce emergency gynaecology resource utilisation. Lay summary: Existing treatments for chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and endometriosis focus on surgery or hormone medication, but these are often ineffective or associated with unacceptable side-effects. As a result, women continue to experience chronic pain and often have 'flares' of worsening pain that may lead to hospital admission. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in backlogged gynaecology clinics and surgeries. The aim of this study was to compare the management of emergency pelvic pain admissions for women with CPP before and after COVID-19. We also aimed to better understand their in-hospital management and estimate their hospital length of stay costs. We did not find an increase in CPP patients admitted for pelvic pain flares after the COVID-19 lockdown. Women with CPP often undergo multiple hospital tests and are often prescribed with strong pain medications which can cause long-term problems. Efforts are needed to improve long-term pain management for women with CPP.

COVID-19 vaccination experience in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated at a single VA medical center.

Background: Following the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccines, there has been uncertainty as to whether receiving the COVID-19 vaccine will result in overactivation of the immune system and subsequently lead to an autoimmune disease flare.The purpose of this study was to assess whether rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who received the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine are at increased risk for disease flare. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective and prospective study at the Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center between 12/2021 and 2/2022. We included 100 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were actively on immunosuppressive therapy and received three doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. A survey questionnaire was used to collect data about their RA and if they developed symptoms post vaccination. Our primary end point was to determine incidence of flare of RA after COVID-19 vaccine. Secondary end points were to estimate the side effect profile from the vaccine, and to check if patients developed a COVID-19 infection after they received the vaccine. Results: None of the patients reported symptoms of RA flare within two months of receiving the 3 doses of the vaccine. Most common vaccine side effects were soreness over the injection site (n = 14), headache (n = 11), fatigue(n = 7) and myalgias(n = 4). 5 patients developed a COVID-19 infection prior to receiving the vaccine, 8 after being vaccinated, 3 of the 8 within 5 months from the second dose and 5 out of the 8 within 3 months from the third vaccine dose. Conclusion: RA patients receiving the COVID-19 Pfizer mRNA vaccine do not appear to commonly develop major symptoms, flares or side effects following the vaccine. Further research with larger numbers of patients with rheumatoid arthritis as well as those with other autoimmune disease is needed to better understand the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine.

Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Flare-Up after Both Doses of BBIBP-CorV Vaccination in a Patient under Adalimumab Treatment: A Case Report.

Generalized pustular psoriasis is a possibly serious condition that can be triggered by various factors. Previous studies show a slight likelihood of disease exacerbation subsequent to COVID-19 vaccination. Here, we present the first (to the best of our knowledge) case of pustular psoriasis flare after each one of the two shots of the BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm) vaccine despite adalimumab treatment.

Epidemiology of Immune-Mediated Glomerulopathies before and after SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination: A Tertiary Referral Hospital Experience.

BACKGROUND: Vaccination is a known trigger for the appearance of immune-mediated glomerulopathies (IMG). The appearance of IMG after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with suspected causality has been described. Our aim is to analyze the incidence of IMG flares before and after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in our center. METHODS: All persons with native kidney biopsy (KB) from January 2019 to March 2022 in our center were included in the study. We compared the incidence of IMG before and after the start of vaccination. We also collected information about whether the patients had received a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine or have suffered from COVID in the six weeks before the IMG. We also evaluated the analytical characteristics of the outbreaks. RESULTS: A total of 386 KB were studied. Of them, 86/218 (39.4%) were IMG performed pre- and 85/168 (50.6%) post-SV (029). The incidence of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS), studied separately, was also significantly increased post-vaccination (n = 18 (10.7%)) compared to pre-vaccination (n = 11 (5%)) (p = 0.036). There were no differences in the incidence of vasculitis or IgA nephropathy. Up to 17 (20%) flares occurred 6 weeks before SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and only 2 (2.4%) within the first 6 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Within those 17 flares, the most common diagnosis was IgAN (n = 5 (29.4%)); a total of 14 (82.4%) received an mRNA vaccine and 9 (52.9%) took place after the 1st vaccine dose. There were 13 cases of minimal change disease (MCD) with debut/recurrence pre-SV and 20 MCD with debut/recurrence post-SV (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of IMG, INS and MCD flares in our center increased significantly after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Importantly, 20% of IMG flares took place within the first 6 weeks after receiving a vaccine dose, with the first dose being the riskiest one and IgAN the most frequent diagnosis.

C-Reactive protein rise in rheumatology patients following COVID-19 vaccination.

Objective: The aim was to determine the proportion of patients with inflammatory arthritis who have a flare of their rheumatological disease within 4 weeks of receiving a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine, using CRP as a surrogate marker. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of notes for patients with inflammatory arthritis within 30 days of their COVID-19 vaccine. An electronic database (DAWN) was used to identify all patients who were currently on a DMARD or biologic therapy. This was then correlated with vaccine data from the National Immunisation and Vaccination System (NIVS) and CRP within 30 days of their vaccination. Results: From the DAWN database, 1620 adults were identified (mean age 61 years, 64% female). Three types of vaccinations were administered: AstraZeneca (AZ), BioNTech-Pfizer or Moderna. Vaccine uptake was 1542 of 1620 (95.2% for the first dose), 1550 of 1620 (95.7% for the second dose) and 1437 of 1620 (88.7% for the third dose). One hundred and ninety-two of 1542 patients (12.5%) had a CRP rise of >10 mg/l within 30 days of their vaccine, which was higher than the baseline flare rate of 8.6% (P = 0.0004). Conclusion: Patients with inflammatory arthritis and on DMARDs have a high uptake of COVID-19 vaccine (95%), which is greater than the national average. A CRP rise >10 mg/l within 30 days of vaccination was observed in ∼1 in 10 patients in our study population after all three doses. There might be a slight increase in disease flare in patients with inflammatory arthritis after COVID-19 vaccinations, and additional research is required to assess this association further.

The Third Dose of BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccine Does Not "Boost" Disease Flares and Adverse Events in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Data on the risk of adverse events (AEs) and disease flares in autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) after the third dose of COVID-19 vaccine are scarce. The aim of this multicenter, prospective study is to analyze the clinical and immunological safety of BNT162b2 vaccine in a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients followed-up from the first vaccine cycle to the third dose. The vaccine showed an overall good safety profile with no patient reporting serious AEs, and a low percentage of total AEs at both doses (40/78 (51.3%) and 13/47 (27.7%) patients after the second and third dose, respectively (p < 0.002). Flares were observed in 10.3% of patients after the end of the vaccination cycle and 12.8% after the third dose. Being vaccinated for influenza was inversely associated with the onset of AEs after the second dose, at both univariable (p = 0.013) and multivariable analysis (p = 0.027). This result could allow identification of a predictive factor of vaccine tolerance, if confirmed in larger patient populations. A higher disease activity at baseline was not associated with a higher incidence of AEs or disease flares. Effectiveness was excellent after the second dose, with only 1/78 (1.3%) mild breakthrough infection (BI) and worsened after the third dose, with 9/47 (19.2%) BI (p < 0.002), as a probable expression of the higher capacity of the Omicron variants to escape vaccine recognition.

Incidence, features, and outcome of disease relapse after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is relatively safe in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM); however, myositis flares following vaccination have been poorly studied. We aimed to evaluate the frequency, features, and outcomes of disease relapses in patients with IIM following COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS: A cohort of 176 IIM patients were interviewed after the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic and followed prospectively. Relapses were determined using the disease state criteria and the outcome of the flares with myositis response criteria, calculating the total improvement score (TIS). RESULTS: A total of 146 (82.9%) patients received a vaccination, 17/146 (11.6%) patients had a relapse within 3 mo, and 13/146 (8.9%) patients within 1 mo. The relapse rate of unvaccinated patients was 3.3%. Three months after the post-vaccination relapses, 70.6% of the patients (12/17) achieved an improvement of disease activity (average TIS score: 30 ± 15.81; seven minor, five moderate, and zero major improvements). Six months after flares improvement was detected in 15/17(88.2%) of relapsed patients (average TIS score: 43.1 ± 19.53; 3 minimal, 8 moderate, and 4 major). Forward stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that the active state of myositis at the time of injection (p < .0001; odds ratio, 33; confidence interval, 9-120) was significantly associated with the occurrence of a relapse. DISCUSSION: A minority of the vaccinated IIM patients had a confirmed disease flare after COVID-19 vaccination and the majority of the relapses improved after individualized treatment. An active disease state at the time of vaccination probably contributes to the increased risk of a post vaccination myositis flare.

Psoriasis flares after COVID-19 vaccination: adherence to biologic therapy reduces psoriasis exacerbations: a case-control study.

This study aimed to evaluate if patients under biologics have a lower risk of psoriasis flares after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination than other psoriatic patients. Of 322 recently vaccinated patients admitted for psoriasis at the Dermatological Psoriasis Unit during January and February 2022, 316 (98%) had no psoriasis flares after COVID-19 vaccination (79% under biologic treatment, 21% not biologically treated) and 6 (2%) presented psoriasis flares after COVID-19 vaccination (33.3% under biologic treatment, 66.6% not biologically treated). Overall, psoriasis patients under biologic treatment, developed fewer psoriasis flares after COVID-19 vaccination (33.3%), than patients not under biologic treatment (66.6%) (p=0.0207; Fisher's exact test).

Risk of exacerbation of rheumatic disease after COVID-19 vaccination

Objectives: To investigate the risk of flare-ups after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with rheumatic disease. Method(s): A total of 1617 patients with rheumatic diseases were identified from three rheumatology clinics. Patients were interviewed for demographic data, disease activity, and vaccination status. Clinical disease flare up was determined independently by expert opinion by managing rheumatologists. Change of serum markers and medications were retrieved from medical records. The risk of exacerbation of rheumatic disease, change in serum markers, and escalation of rheumatic medications between vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients were determined using cox, linear and logistic regression models respectively. Possible confounding factors were also taken into consideration. Result(s): There were 562 (34.76%) patients received COVID-19 vaccine. After vaccination, rheumatic disease (HR = 2.10, P < 0.001), inflammatory arthritis (HR = 2.71, P < 0.001), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (HR = 2.03, P = 0.002), spondyloarthritis (SpA) (HR = 4.78, P < 0.001), autoimmune disease (HR = 1.77, P = 0.01), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (HR = 1.99, P = 0.02) were associated with clinical flare up. Adult still's disease (B = 12.76, P = 0.03) was associated with an increase in CRP level. Escalation of rheumatic medications were not associated with COVID-19 vaccination in all diseases. Subgroup analyses showed only mRNA vaccine was associated with disease flare ups. Conclusion(s): COVID-19 vaccine was associated with minor disease flare up but not escalation of rheumatic medications. In the absence of absolute contraindications, full COVID-19 vaccination in patients with rheumatic disease should be encouraged by managing rheumatologists.

Autoimmune blistering skin diseases triggered by COVID-19 vaccinations: An Australian case series.

Autoimmune blistering skin diseases (AIBD) can be induced or flared by a multitude of sources, however, there have been some reports suggesting that this occurrence is due to COVID-19 vaccinations. At a single academic blistering disease centre in Sydney, Australia, a retrospective review was conducted, identifying 59 patients with AIBD seen between February 2021 and November 2022. Secondary to recent COVID-19 vaccination, four patients had induction of bullous pemphigoid, three patients had a flare of pre-existing bullous pemphigoid, one patient had induction of pemphigus, and two patients had a flare of pre-existing pemphigus vulgaris. This adds to our understanding of the role of vaccinations in the activity of AIBD.

Systemic lupus erythematosus following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, a review of literature

From March 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic challenged public health and healthcare systems worldwide. Viral infection is one of the environmental factors that has been associated with the development, relapse, or exacerbation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). SLE patients are at an increased risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) because of immune system dysfunction related to their disease as well as immunosuppression medications. So far, the most effective way to reduce SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced hospitalization and death is vaccination. On the other hand, SLE patients present distinct challenges related to the safety and effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. We have reviewed some reports on the onset or flare of SLE post-COVID-19 vaccination. Of note, the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are associated with increased SLE disease activity, more frequently than the other types of COVID-19 vaccines. © 2023 The Author(s).

A Case of Multiple Sclerosis Uncovered Following Moderna SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination.

Multiple sclerosis is a demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system characterized by lesions disseminated in time and space. The diagnostic criteria for laboratory-supported definite multiple sclerosis involve two episodes of symptoms, evidence of at least one white matter lesion on MRI, and abnormal oligoclonal bands in cerebrospinal fluid. Patients usually present in their early 20s and on average have up to one flare-up per year. While vaccines play an important role in the prevention of many diseases, they have often been purported as a potential trigger of multiple sclerosis and multiple sclerosis relapses. The medical literature provides reliable information concerning the risk of developing multiple sclerosis and multiple sclerosis relapses following the administration of most vaccines, but not much is known about the novel Moderna severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS­CoV­2) vaccine. We report the case of a 24-year-old male who presented with right-sided facial weakness, dizziness, and dysarthria two days after receiving his first dose of the Moderna coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. Imaging studies noted both acute and chronic central nervous system lesions. He met the diagnostic criteria for laboratory-supported definite multiple sclerosis. His acute flare was treated with intravenous corticosteroids and the patient was subsequently started on ocrelizumab. This case serves as an important example of the novel Moderna SARS-CoV-2 vaccine as a potential trigger of multiple sclerosis relapse. In addition, we review the literature for similar occurrences with the other COVID-19 vaccines and provide reliable guidance for COVID-19 vaccination for patients with multiple sclerosis.

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in adolescent and adult patients with juvenile onset systemic lupus erythematosus: tolerability and impact on disease activity.

OBJECTIVES: Juvenile onset systemic lupus erythematosus (jSLE) has a severe presentation and a remitting course. Patients with jSLE carry an increased vulnerability to infections, which also act as triggers of disease flare. Thus, vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is an important tool in jSLE. The objective of this study is to evaluate the tolerability and the safety of anti-SARS-COV-2 vaccination, including the booster, in a monocentric cohort of jSLE patients. METHODS: Clinical records of jSLE patients who received at least one dose of any anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were retrospectively reviewed. Data about disease activity, treatment, anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and COVID-19 infection were collected. RESULTS: 65 jSLE patients received at least one dose of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, while 46 patients completed the schedule with the booster. The rate of mild-moderate adverse events was 66%, mainly comprising fever, fatigue, arthromyalgias and pain at injection site. The rate of adverse events after the booster was similar to that registered after the first two doses. No significant changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in BILAG and SLEDAI were observed. Disease flare rate (mainly lupus nephritis) after immunization was 10.8%. Flares occurred predominantly in patients with moderate disease activity before immunization; accordingly, SLEDAI≥4 identified patients at risk of flare while LLDAS plays a protective role against post-vaccination flare. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in jSLE is well-tolerated; a strict clinical monitoring and a thoughtful choice of vaccination timing should be devoted to patients not in LLDAS due to the risk of post-vaccine flare.

Feasibility of conducting a randomized, placebo-controlled study assessing whether omega-3 fatty acids prevent gout flares when starting urate-lowering treatment.

Objective: The aim was to test the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial exploring whether omega-3 fatty acid supplementation limits gout flares during treat-to-target urate-lowering treatment (T2T-ULT). Methods: Adults with at least one gout flare in the past 12 months and serum urate (SU) ≥360 µmol/l were recruited from general practices (primary method) and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive omega-3 fatty acid supplementation (4 g/day) or placebo for 28 weeks. At week 5, participants began T2T-ULT. The primary outcome was drop-out rate. Secondary outcomes were recruitment rate, outcome data completeness, the number, severity and duration of gout flares between weeks 5 and 28, and study drug compliance. Results: Ninety-five per cent of randomized participants (n = 60) completed all study visits. The primary method recruitment rate was 2.2%. Fifty and 42 participants achieved SU < 360 and 300 µmol/l (6 and 5 mg/dl), respectively. The number of gout flares [median (interquartile range): active 1 (0-2) and placebo 1 (0-2)], flare duration [mean (s.d.): active 7.00 (4.52) days and placebo 7.06 (8.14) days] and time to first flare [hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.97 (0.50, 1.86)] were comparable between both arms. Study drug compliance was high and comparable in both arms [median (interquartile range) returned capsule count: active 57 (26-100) and placebo 58 (27-154)]; red blood cell omega-3 fatty acid index increased twofold in the active arm and remained unchanged in the control arm. Conclusion: The study demonstrated feasibility and provided useful metrics for conducting a community-based gout flare prophylaxis trial. Study registration: ISRCTN; https://www.isrctn.com/; ISRCTN79392964.

[Relapse of lupus nephritis in temporal association with anti SARS-CoV-2 vaccination]

During the past two years we have witness a tremendous worldwide health crisis imposed by the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). This situation led to the urgent development and implementation of vaccines in an attempt to decrease not only the SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility but also the severe forms of COVID-19. Although these vaccines were approved based on an adequate benefit-risk ratio, at the moment of their implementation in 2021 we did not have sub-studies in special populations;patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) among them. We describe two cases of lupus nephritis flare following the immunization against SARS-CoV-2 with the first component of Sputnik V and Sinopharm. Both patients were in complete remission on maintenance therapy with mycophenolate and without glucocorticoids. The flare presented with an increased protein/creatinine ratio in urine and positive anti-DNA antibodies without other relevant accompanying findings. After treatment with prednisone (20 y 10 mg/day in case 1 and 2, respectively) and an increased dose of mycophenolate (from 1.5 g/day to 2.0 g/dayand 1.08 to 1.44 g/dia of sodic mycophenolate in case 1 y 2, respectively) both patients regained renal remission. These cases are of relevance as they introduce a possible association between the different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine platforms and SLE flares;at the same time to suggest the need for close control in the post vaccination period in this population of patients.